For those of you who aren't already using it, the site in question is, and it's sort of like a Pirate Bay of the science world. It was established in 2011 by neuroscientist Alexandra Elbakyan, who was frustrated that she couldn't afford to access the articles needed for her research, and it's since gone viral, with hundreds of thousands of papers being downloaded daily. But at the end of last year, the site was - a ruling that Elbakyan has decided to fight, triggering a debate over who really owns science. 'Payment of $32 is just insane when you need to skim or read tens or hundreds of these papers to do research. I obtained these papers by pirating them,'. 'Everyone should have access to knowledge regardless of their income or affiliation. And that’s absolutely legal.' It also comes for both Windows and Mac platforms. Scientific Journal Information 3.4 Free Download For Mac![]() If it sounds like a modern day Robin Hood struggle, that's because it kinda is. But in this story, it's not just the poor who don't have access to scientific papers - journal subscriptions have become so expensive that leading universities such as and have admitted they can no longer afford them. Researchers have also taken a stand - with 15,000 scientists in part for its excessive paywall fees. Don't get us wrong, journal publishers have also done a whole lot of good - they've encouraged better research thanks to peer review, and before the Internet, they were crucial to the dissemination of knowledge. But in recent years, more and more people are beginning to question whether they're still helping the progress of science. In fact, in some cases, the is creating more problems than solutions, with a growing number of predatory publishers now charging researchers to have their work published - often without any proper peer review process. 'They feel pressured to do this,' Elbakyan. 'If a researcher wants to be recognised, make a career - he or she needs to have publications in such journals.' That's where Sci-Hub comes into the picture. The site works in two stages. First of all when you search for a paper, Sci-Hub tries to immediately download it from fellow pirate database. If that doesn't work, Sci-Hub is able to bypass journal paywalls thanks to a range of access keys that have been donated by anonymous academics (thank you, science spies). This means that Sci-Hub can instantly access any paper published by the big guys, including JSTOR, Springer, Sage, and Elsevier, and deliver it to you for free within seconds. The site then automatically sends a copy of that paper to LibGen, to help share the love.
The 3.4 version of Scientific Journal Information for Mac is provided as a free download on our software library. The size of the latest installation package available is 1005 KB. This free software for Mac OS X is an intellectual property of Marc Girondot. Free DownloadIt's an ingenious system, as Simon Oxenham: 'In one fell swoop, a network has been created that likely has a greater level of access to science than any individual university, or even government for that matter, anywhere in the world. Sci-Hub represents the sum of countless different universities' institutional access - literally a world of knowledge.' That's all well and good for us users, but understandably, the big publishers are pissed off. Last year, a New York court, making its domain unavailable (something Elbakyan dodged by ), and the site is also being sued by Elsevier for 'irreparable harm' - a case that around $750 to $150,000 for each pirated article. Python 3.4 Free Download For Windows 10Even at the lowest estimations, that would quickly add up to millions in damages. But Elbakyan is not only standing her ground, she's come out swinging, claiming that it's Elsevier that have the illegal business model. 'I think Elsevier’s business model is itself illegal,' referring to article 27 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights, 'everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits'. She also explains that the academic publishing situation is different to the music or film industry, where pirating is ripping off creators.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |